AkashicNET · Conference futures · Independent proposal

TSC Symbiosis Hub

A climate-adapted commons for consciousness research.

What if a conference’s exhibition space became a place to discover useful work, compare ideas carefully and begin collaborations that last beyond the final session?

Architectural concept of a coastal conference pavilion with branching timber supports, mycelium-like panels, shaded gathering places and research exhibition pods.
AI-generated architectural concept, not the actual venue or an approved design. The specification replaces the illustration’s decorative water feature with a water-budgeted landscape.

Created for AkashicNET with ChatGPT-assisted research and design on 13 October 2026, following a request to connect the organisations encountered at TSC in San Diego. Published on akashicnet.org to explain their work, prepare useful questions and explore possible collaborations; this is an independent resource, not an official TSC or sponsor publication.

A physical place, a continuing commons

Connected by questions.
Distinct in their methods.

The mycelium metaphor gives this pavilion its branching paths and shared gathering spaces. It is a design inspiration, not evidence that the participating theories converge or that a building is conscious.

Modular demonstration spaces could introduce instruments, publications, educational programmes and research opportunities. Each would connect to a digital profile carrying sources, questions and a concrete next step.

The people and organisations

Find a useful conversation.

Six sponsors, seven exhibitors, twelve unique profiles. IONS appears in both lists.

12 profiles

Roles checked against the official sponsor strip and exhibitor list on 13 October 2026. Booth numbers and current availability are not confirmed here. Listings do not imply participation in this proposed hub.

Our comparison · proposed points of connection

Overlap does not mean equivalence.

Some organisations measure, some investigate, others interpret, publish, convene or fund. Their strongest connection may be a shared workflow rather than a shared explanation of consciousness.

Roles and possible contributions; these are AkashicNET suggestions.
ProfilePrimary rolePossible first contribution
OSS CapitalFundA small, clearly licensed evidence-record schema, runnable example and researcher usability pilot.
The Consciousness FoundationConveneA reviewed evidence record for one question, with an optional crosswalk into CoFo’s existing taxonomy.
Alvin ClarkSupportAn owner-reviewed public profile and a source-linked reading collection around a question they select.
Institute of Noetic SciencesInvestigateA source-linked Discovery Lab reading guide separating exploratory and preregistered work, findings and limitations.
Google Quantum AIComputeA version-pinned Cirq simulation with source links, expected outputs and explicit limits of interpretation.
Cyan BanisterSupportA concise opportunity brief and a human-reviewed demo with a transparent feedback record.
ANT NeuroMeasureA researcher-reviewed measurement-to-claim guide around one permission-cleared dataset, with a data dictionary and processing provenance.
CosmointelInvestigateA versioned analysis of one permitted dataset, followed by a preregistered independent replication proposal if warranted.
Academy for the Advancement of Postmaterialist SciencesInterpretA reviewed study pack with operational definitions, competing explanations and a replication checklist.
CUSAC / My Big TOEInterpretOne source-linked experimental comparison, reviewed by the team and a researcher with a contrasting interpretation.
Journal of Consciousness StudiesPublishA bibliographic guide and a manually authored, expert-reviewed comparison, using permitted material and linking to publisher records.
New Paradigm InstituteDocumentA public-record timeline with primary links, source types, revision history and competing interpretations.

AkashicOMNI’s contribution

DISCERN: clarify the question, source, assumptions and uncertainty. DEEPEN: compare alternative explanations and disconfirming evidence. Report the synthesis with unresolved questions intact.

Read the public manual method →

What each comparison must retain

Definitions, observation versus interpretation, methods, predictions, data access, review status, conflicts and a condition that would change the conclusion. A common vocabulary must not erase disagreement.

From the deeper Cosmointel review

Begin with one reproducible result.

Cosmointel already has source discovery tools. Associated plant papers also identify datasets, and the salinity paper has public peer-review reports. A practical offer is to reproduce one analysis, document discrepancies and only then plan an independent experiment.

This is a conditional proposal: dataset files were not retrieved in this review, and existing analysis code should be checked before building anything new.

Architecture with a test plan

Adaptation must be demonstrated.

The proposed pavilion pairs an open shaded commons with access to an enclosed cooled and filtered refuge. Mycelium panels begin as replaceable nonstructural components, with product-specific moisture, fire, durability and emissions checks.

Read requirements, verification and delivery gates ↗