CANDIDATE REVIEW · 26 SEPTEMBER 2026

What would make
v0.5.0 ready?

AkashicOMNI’s published specification remains v0.4.3. The next candidate is a reusable claim-review capability. This checkpoint records what existing articles show and what still needs to be demonstrated.

CURRENT DECISION · HOLD · NOT RELEASED

THE PROPOSED METHOD

One claim. A reviewable record.

Each record should retain these fields without forcing all thirteen lenses onto every claim. A perspective is chosen because it helps test a specific question.

Claim

One precise proposition, scope, date and method version.

Source

Identity, access actually obtained, provenance and reuse rights.

Boundary

Observation, testimony, interpretation, hypothesis and speculation separated.

Comparison

Relevant lenses, strongest alternative, counter-evidence and disagreements.

Outcome

A bounded conclusion, uncertainty and what could change it.

Governance

Consequences, privacy, cultural authority, reviewer and correction history.

THREE RETROSPECTIVE TRIAL CASES

Different claims. The same discipline.

These are mappings of already published articles, not completed validated Claim Review Records or independent checks of all underlying sources.

Eliminating the Impossible? ↗

Already visible: A source-linked philosophical claim, rival accounts and the contested step from surviving a filter to being true.
Remaining work: Common record and second review of rival definitions.
Current boundary: Conclusion unresolved.

Beyond the Jar ↗

Already visible: Personal testimony, product-label facts, seller claims, Indigenous context and CARE questions kept distinct.
Remaining work: Batch-level provenance and appropriate authority before any stronger product or cultural claim.
Current boundary: Maker, composition and authorisation unverified.

BQ001 · Consciousness beyond the individual? ↗

Already visible: Competing models, source distinctions and specific questions that could distinguish explanations.
Remaining work: Select a bounded claim for the common record; check source independence and denominator.
Current boundary: BQ001 remains unresolved; accepted canonical edges: zero.

FIRST FORMAL DRAFT TRIAL · 26 SEPTEMBER 2026

Cogitate: a test of the record itself.

Read Claim Review Trial 01 → It states one bounded research claim, distinguishes the experiment from its later data descriptor, records supportive and challenging results, applies the OMNI entries and sets a revision condition. This AI-assisted draft awaits independent human review and does not satisfy the release gate on its own.

RELEASE CONDITIONS

Evidence for the method itself.

Publish the common template and apply it to at least three contrasting, bounded claims with traceable source access.
Check omissions, adverse evidence, disagreements, citations, rights, privacy and cultural authority; record who reviewed each case.
Show what the method makes clearer or corrects relative to v0.4.3. Agreement among lenses within this project is not independent corroboration.
Classify the version change, document compatibility and limitations, then publish the specification and release notes.

7 October 2026 is a review target. Release only if these conditions are met. Otherwise publish a progress note and revise the date.