Big Question 001 · Consciousness
CURRENT STATUS · OPEN QUESTION · EXPLORATION IN PROGRESS · DEEPENING · LEVEL 8/10
Does consciousness continue
beyond the individual?
The evidence does not currently justify a definitive answer. Research is active, but greater activity is not the same as a shift toward “yes” or “no.” This page holds competing models in view and records what would have to change our minds.
Question boundary
Several questions hide inside one.
Does experience occur during cardiac arrest? Can it occur after irreversible loss of brain function? Could consciousness be fundamental while an individual identity still ends? Continuation of consciousness, continuation of memory, and continuation of this person are not interchangeable claims.
Evidence profile · snapshot, not verdict
Open questions.
Exploration in progress.
These indicators describe the state of inquiry, not a probability that consciousness survives death.
No decisive result currently separates brain-production, mediation and continuation models.
Strong brain–experience dependence coexists with testimony and contested findings that motivate further study.
Resuscitation science, neurophysiology and structured study of exceptional experiences continue to develop.
Prospective targets and continuous physiology can test narrower claims, but not every metaphysical model.
Better measurements and discriminating predictions could move parts of the question over years or decades.
Possible Answers Explorer · five competing pathways
Enter through wonder.
Leave with the uncertainty intact.
Choose a doorway or let chance choose one. Random selection is uniform navigation—not a probability, recommendation or truth ranking.
01 / 05
Possible answer · not a conclusion
Brain generation
This model proposes that individual consciousness is generated by living brain processes and ends when those processes irreversibly end. Neural generation and sensory filtering can coexist.
- Evidence position
- Established brain–experience dependencies; the claim that the brain wholly generates consciousness remains an interpretation of those observations.
- Strongest challenge
- Ordinary sensory filtering does not establish filtration of a more fundamental consciousness. The models need distinguishing predictions.
- Question that could move it
- What would distinguish generation, filtration of wider awareness, or a combination?
Visual constellation
See the five hypotheses orbit the same unresolved question. Position and colour carry no evidential ranking.
Reading layer
Plain-language claim, evidence position, strongest challenge and a testable next question.
Listen
Optional browser narration of the selected pathway. No audio starts without your action.
Motion journey
A slow, atmospheric pathway animation. Reduced-motion preferences automatically remove movement.
Model comparison · 7 October 2026
Brain as generator,
filter, or both?
Woollacott’s question opens this comparison: could the brain constrain a consciousness it does not wholly generate? “Filter” also has an ordinary neuroscientific meaning: selecting information for further processing. These are different claims.
Filter of wider awareness
Their 2025 review explores whether changes in neural filtering during meditation, psychedelic states and near-death experiences could permit wider awareness, potentially including nonlocal information.
This gives a possible interpretation of experiences of expansion or unity. The review does not establish an external source of consciousness, a transmission mechanism or survival after death.
Read the review abstractGenerator of experience
On this account, organised brain activity generates conscious experience. Changes during anaesthesia, injury and recovery help constrain the explanation; a vivid experience need not come from outside the brain.
A neuroscientific account must still connect measured activity to the content and timing of a reported experience. Explaining dependence does not, by itself, settle every philosophical question.
Consciousness and the Dying BrainBoth can be considered
A brain-generation model can also include neural filtering: constructing experience and selecting sensory inputs are compatible functions. Research in mice directly examines thalamic control of sensory selection.
A stronger hybrid would combine brain-shaped experience with a more fundamental consciousness. That remains a hypothesis requiring predictions that distinguish it from brain-only accounts. “Both” is not automatically a compromise or a finding.
Read the sensory-selection studyCommunity reading and a case-attribution check
The N2N Woollacott discussion offers an interpretive starting point. The retrieved version appears to join a dentures account to a separate childbirth account; consult the original sources for case details.
Woollacott and Peyton’s case report concerns Bettina Peyton’s childbirth experience. The dentures narrative concerns a different patient in van Lommel and colleagues’ 2001 article. They are kept separate here. Attribution checks do not independently validate either account’s proposed explanation.
Independent, AI-assisted editorial comparison. Abstracts and case attribution checked 7 October 2026; not a full methodological appraisal. BQ001 remains UNRESOLVED. Personal resonance can guide a question; it does not determine its answer.
A
Competing model
Brain-dependent consciousness
Individual consciousness is generated by, or wholly realised through, living brain processes. When those processes irreversibly end, the individual stream of experience ends.
What supports it
- Established Evidence Anaesthesia, injury, stimulation, disease and sleep reliably alter conscious state and content with changes in brain function.
- Established Evidence Measurable organised brain activity can persist or briefly re-emerge during some resuscitation and dying processes.
- Interpretation The most economical reading is that reported experiences depend on residual, recovering or reconstructive brain activity.
Counter-inferences
- Dependence and correlation do not, by themselves, settle whether the brain produces, constrains or transmits consciousness.
- Current measurements are incomplete, especially during rapidly changing physiology and successful resuscitation.
- A report that existing models do not yet explain is not automatically evidence for survival—but neither is it explained merely by giving it a neural label.
B
Competing model
Continuation / non-local consciousness
The brain may mediate or localise a consciousness that is not wholly produced by it; some aspect of consciousness could therefore continue beyond an individual organism.
What supports it
- Lived Experience/Testimony Some people report vivid near-death experiences, perceived separation from the body, encounters, or memories interpreted as continuity.
- Established Evidence Such reports exist across populations and can be studied; their existence as reports is not in dispute.
- Hypothesis Filter, transmission, idealist and panpsychist models offer ways to interpret consciousness as more fundamental than individual neural activity.
Counter-inferences
- No study has established conscious experience after irreversible brain death, or demonstrated a mechanism carrying personal identity beyond it.
- Experiences recalled after recovery may have formed before loss of function, during residual activity, or while function returned.
- Similarity, sincerity and transformative impact do not establish external accuracy; prospective target tests have not produced decisive replication.
- Conservation of energy does not imply conservation of memory, personality or subjective identity.
Counter-inference ledger
What the observations
do not yet decide.
Cardiac arrest ≠ irreversible brain death
CPR is a reversible physiological interval. Findings during it cannot automatically be extended to permanent death.
Neural signal ≠ reported experience
Gamma power or connectivity can be compatible with conscious processing, but is not a direct readout of a specific experience.
No detected signal ≠ no possible signal
Instrumentation and sampling have limits. Absence of measurement is informative only within a study’s sensitivity and timing.
Anomaly ≠ preferred metaphysics
An unexplained case may challenge a model; it does not select reincarnation, dualism, idealism or any other account by default.
Continuity ≠ personal survival
Even if consciousness were fundamental, the persistence of autobiographical identity would require separate evidence.
Meaning ≠ mechanism
A life-changing experience can be psychologically and spiritually meaningful while its causal interpretation remains unsettled.
Open state-of-consciousness map
Compare the whole field.
Do not collapse the states.
This is an extensible taxonomy rather than a claim that every state is equivalent or that the list is permanently complete.
Waking attention, mind-wandering, fatigue, flow, sleep onset, hypnagogia, dreams, lucid dreams and waking from sleep.
Mindfulness, mettā, prayer, jhāna, samādhi, non-dual awareness, absorption, self-transcendence and reported cessation states.
Chanting, drumming, dancing, pilgrimage, fasting, vigil, possession and trance, recorded with culture, lineage, setting and permission.
Anaesthesia, syncope, seizure, fever, delirium, coma, cardiac arrest, near-death experience and unexpected or terminal lucidity.
Psychedelic, dissociative, empathogenic, cannabis, stimulant, sedative and deliriant states, with dose uncertainty, interactions and harm reduction kept visible.
Psychosis, mania, dissociation, depersonalisation, derealisation, trauma flashbacks and persistent perceptual changes. Clinical care is not displaced by metaphysical interpretation.
Sensory deprivation or overload, isolation, extreme exertion, breath alteration, pain, altitude and other conditions that change perception or self-processing.
Out-of-body experience, mediumship, channelled or entity encounters, apparent psi, past-life memory and intermission reports. The experience and its proposed ontology are recorded separately.
Evidence map
One question.
Five claim layers.
01Established Evidence02Interpretation03Lived Experience/Testimony04Hypothesis05Speculation
Labels classify how each claim is being used here. They are not a ranking of personal significance, and they remain open to revision.
Interpretive lenses · Contemplative traditions & philosophy of mind
Ways of describing self and consciousness are not verdicts.
Contemplative traditions offer non-ordinary models of selfhood
Buddhist non-self analysis and meditation frameworks examine how the sense of self can be constructed, deconstructed and transformed.
BoundaryContemplative phenomenology, tradition and meditation-related changes in self-processing do not establish external ontology or survival after death.
Physicalism, dualism and panpsychism remain competing philosophical frameworks
These positions offer different accounts of how mind relates to the physical world, but none functions as an empirical verdict on BQ001.
BoundaryPhilosophical coherence or possibility is not empirical evidence that personal consciousness survives death; physicalism as philosophy is not itself proof of non-survival.
Adjacent inquiry · kept evidentially separate
REINCARNATION
REIMAGINED.
Past-life reports, Indian case histories, traditions, NDEs, OBEs and cultural narratives require their own provenance and authentication trail. Evidence for one phenomenon is not automatically evidence for another.
Unauthenticated does not mean false. Unexplained does not mean proven.Continuity, memory
and identity
Explore the separate reincarnation inquiry map.
Enter AkashicTIMELESS →Reincarnation evidence trail · expanded 14 September 2026
Thousands of reports.
No settled mechanism.
University of Virginia researchers report more than 2,500 investigated childhood cases. A 2022 scoping review found 78 observational studies, mostly child case reports using interviews and document checks. The archive is substantial enough for pattern analysis, but case selection, cultural expectation, information leakage, retrospective matching and limited independent replication prevent a reincarnation verdict.
What would matter most Statements recorded before a proposed match, blinded comparison against several candidates, documented exposure pathways, negative cases, independent replication and predictions that distinguish reincarnation from memory error, suggestion, fraud, cryptomnesia and other anomalous-information models.
Open the 2025 research overview ↗Community source cluster · primary-source check · 17 September 2026
Four public entry points.
One overlapping research lineage.
A popular case documentary, interviews with Jim Tucker and Philip Cozzolino, and an N2N “Biological Evidence” lecture brief now form a traceable r/NeuronsToNirvana source cluster. Two original papers have been added beneath the commentary so the underlying claims and limitations can be checked directly.
Primary-source result Pasricha et al. report twelve malformation cases and describe their correspondence evidence as inconclusive; for two birth-defect cases they obtained no direct evidence of the claimed correspondence. Keil and Tucker examine cases in which statements were written down before a deceased person was identified, reducing retrospective inflation while retaining unverified statements and possible information-exposure questions.
Independence boundary Tucker coauthored the written-record paper, the later overview and the scoping review, while the community interviews and lecture brief draw substantially from the same research programme. These are distinct records but not independent confirmations.
Classification CANDIDATE / HOLD · DERIVATIVE OR SHARED-SOURCE CONTEXT. Reported birthmark or congenital-anomaly correlations still require suitable comparison rates, preregistered matching rules, retained mismatches and independent replication.
Child-safeguarding boundary AkashicNET links to the public posts without reproducing child imagery or identifying narrative details. Public availability does not establish research consent, privacy adequacy or independent verification.
Read the malformations paper ↗Read the written-record paper ↗
Open the documentary lead ↗
Open the Jim Tucker interview ↗
Open the Philip Cozzolino interview ↗
Open the Biological Evidence brief ↗
Case-verification ladder · applied before promotion
A compelling report can move deeper.
It still has to clear each gate.
This ladder records methodological maturity. It is not a truth score, and a case does not inherit a stronger level merely because it appears in several interviews, videos or summaries.
Preserve dated, unedited statements and physical observations before a proposed deceased person or family is identified.
Document family contact, media, travel, local knowledge, prompting, translator influence and every plausible route of information transfer.
Compare the recorded details with several plausible candidates using rules fixed in advance; retain misses, ambiguities and negative cases.
Use contemporaneous medical, police, civil or archival records where lawful and ethical, with reviewers who did not construct the original match.
Independent groups must reproduce the procedure, comparison rate and result before a case pattern can support a broader model.
First audited batch · four coded cases · 17 September 2026
The ladder is now applied.
No case clears all five gates.
Coded identifiers preserve the papers’ privacy convention. The matrix records what the accessible reports support, what remains unknown and why each case stays on HOLD.
KAKeil & Tucker 2005
Statements written before a proposed identity was found
- Timing
- Partial passThe investigator’s interview notes preceded identification, but the first family statements were recalled rather than recorded contemporaneously.
- Exposure
- OpenThe family reported no Istanbul ties, yet one clue concerned a publicly known person and ordinary exposure could not be excluded.
- Matching
- Not metNo blinded comparison against several plausible identities was reported.
- Documents
- MixedSome details were corroborated through records or an independent local source; other claims remained unverified or inconsistent.
- Replication
- Not metNo independent team has reproduced the procedure and result.
Strongest feature: notes made before identification. Main limits: incomplete prospective capture, possible exposure, unblinded single-candidate matching and no independent replication.
DISPOSITION · HOLDPM / KCPasricha et al. 2005
Reported statements and congenital features compared with medical records
- Timing
- Not metStatements were reconstructed later from the mother’s memory rather than preserved before a proposed match.
- Exposure
- Open / highThe proposed identity was already emotionally salient, and the authors note possible interpretation or induction by the mother.
- Matching
- Not metNo blinded alternative-candidate procedure or fixed scoring rule was reported.
- Documents
- Partial passMedical records corroborated features of KC’s illness and treatment, but they did not independently establish the identity claim.
- Replication
- Not metNo independent team has reproduced the comparison.
Medical documentation strengthens the physical history, while retrospective testimony, expectation and the absence of blinded matching keep the case on HOLD.
DISPOSITION · HOLDNK / BabuPasricha et al. 2005
A head mark compared with a documented fatal injury
- Timing
- Not metThe case was investigated years after the reported childhood statements.
- Exposure
- Open / highThe child’s family already knew about the local murder before the families met.
- Matching
- Not metNo blinded comparison against alternative deceased people was reported.
- Documents
- Partial passA postmortem report supported a skull injury, but many attributed statements were unverifiable and other wounds lacked corresponding anomalies.
- Replication
- Not metNo independent team has reproduced the comparison.
A documentary correspondence is present, but retrospective reporting, prior local knowledge, missing correspondences and absent controls prevent promotion.
DISPOSITION · HOLDDG / LSPasricha et al. 2005
A congenital heart condition compared with a relative’s fatal wounds
- Timing
- Not metStatements and correspondences were not frozen before the close-family identity was proposed.
- Exposure
- HighThe proposed identity was the maternal grandfather and the mother already accepted reincarnation.
- Matching
- Not metNo blinded alternative-candidate comparison was reported.
- Documents
- Partial passMedical and autopsy records were reviewed, but the congenital defect did not precisely reproduce the full wound pattern.
- Replication
- Not metNo independent team has reproduced the comparison.
The record permits a bounded anatomical comparison; close-family exposure, retrospective interpretation and an incomplete physical match keep it on HOLD.
DISPOSITION · HOLDCross-case audit · six unique cases · Level 8 maturity
Count the controls.
Count what is missing.
The first four-case batch is now compared with the existing worked profiles for Kumkum Verma and Jagdish Chandra. KA appears once. Shared authorship and citation ancestry mean six cases do not equal six independent replications.
| Gate | Cross-case result | What the accessible records show |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | 3 / 6 partial or stronger | KA, Kumkum Verma and Jagdish Chandra have some record reported before identification or travel. The earliest statements, full originals or exact prompting context remain incomplete. |
| Exposure | 0 / 6 closed | Every case retains an ordinary-information pathway, an untested social route, family expectation, local knowledge or an incompletely reconstructed exposure history. |
| Blinded matching | 0 / 6 cleared | None was selected through a preregistered, blinded comparison against several plausible candidates with a published search denominator. |
| Independent documents | 0 / 6 complete chains | Medical, postmortem, newspaper, magistrate, property or witness records strengthen parts of several cases, but no complete claim-by-claim chain is independently accessible and re-audited. |
| Replication | 0 / 6 replicated | No independent team has repeated the full prospective procedure, alternative-candidate test and outcome accounting. |
| Misses & negatives | Incomplete denominator | Some reports retain doubtful statements, mismatches or qualifications. None publishes the full universe of leads, rejected candidates, failed recognitions and negative cases needed for a rate comparison. |
Continuity, practice & art cluster · review-only · 17 September 2026
Meaning can deepen.
The verdict does not move.
“How-To Transcend Death,” SchwartzReport’s continuity-of-consciousness material and “Regeneration of Awareness” broaden the cultural and interpretive field around death, continuity and awareness. They are deliberately separated from the childhood-case cluster because contemplative guidance, continuity commentary and artwork answer different kinds of questions.
Classification INTERPRETATION / HYPOTHESIS / ARTISTIC METAPHOR. The posts may support reflection and generate research questions, but they are not independent evidence that awareness regenerates or survives death.
Comparison boundary Shared language such as transcendence, continuity or regeneration does not establish a shared mechanism. Psychological transformation during life, changes in fear of death and post-mortem survival remain separate claims.
Open How-To Transcend Death ↗Open The Continuity of Consciousness ↗
Open Regeneration of Awareness ↗
Tradition & knowledge-continuity layer · 17 September 2026
What is reborn?
What is remembered?
“What Is Reincarnation?” enters the map as a tradition-specific teaching rather than a single definition shared by Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism or other traditions. “A Library Without Walls” enters as AkashicNET project provenance: a vision for connected, transparent and compassion-oriented knowledge stewardship.
Category boundary Doctrinal teaching, individual continuity and collective memory are not interchangeable. A library can preserve sources, questions and human contributions without demonstrating that the person who created them survives death.
Governance boundary The library post’s own rule remains controlling: the hypothesis remains a hypothesis, the data remain data, and wonder remains wonder. This layer adds context, not an accepted evidential edge.
Open What Is Reincarnation? ↗Open A Library Without Walls ↗
Historical testimony, culture & responsibility · 17 September 2026
Recurring ideas.
Different evidential roles.
A historical quotation imagining former lives, the HIERATIC Book II roadmap and an IONS-linked cross-cultural overview now sit together for comparison without being collapsed. One records personal or philosophical testimony, one is an editorial wisdom programme, and one maps the history of beliefs across cultures.
Cultural distinction Rebirth, reincarnation, transmigration, karma, ancestral continuity and survival of personal identity are not synonyms. Similar motifs may arise through cultural transmission, recurring human concerns or claimed experience; recurrence alone cannot decide among them.
Current effect on BQ001 The records deepen history, meaning and research questions. They do not verify a remembered prior identity, establish a mechanism or change the unresolved conclusion.
Open the historical quotation ↗Open HIERATIC Book II ↗
Open Reincarnation Across Cultures ↗
Systems, transmission hypotheses & discourse · review-only · 17 September 2026
Connections can be mapped.
The mechanism remains unshown.
HOMESENSE613, across-incarnation and rebirth-selection hypotheses, the 2023 Holberg Debate, a community discourse map, a retrocausal channelled-transmission post, “Consciousness 2.0” prompts and two Lisa Miller-related spirituality talks now form a bounded comparison layer. They contribute systems language, competing perspectives and research prompts without becoming evidence that consciousness survives death.
Classification HYPOTHESIS / TESTIMONY / DEBATE / RESEARCH-AGENDA / INTERPRETATION / DISCOURSE METADATA. Mapping relationships among ideas shows what is connected in a conversation, not which claims are true. Neural correlates of spirituality, wellbeing, awakening or perceived synchronicity do not establish reincarnation or communication beyond death.
Discriminating test A transmission claim would require specific information timestamped before evaluation, inaccessible through ordinary means, tested under blinding against plausible alternatives and independently replicated. Emotional force, thematic fit and retrospective correspondence cannot substitute for those controls.
Current effect on BQ001 No communication channel, retrocausal mechanism, rebirth-selection process, planetary consciousness or survival claim is verified. Accepted edges remain 0, model support remains empty and BQ001 remains UNRESOLVED.
Open HOMESENSE613 ↗Open the across-incarnation question ↗
Open the Holberg Debate ↗
Open the discourse map ↗
Open Retrocausal Channelled Transmission ↗
Open Consciousness 2.0 Explorer Insights ↗
Open the Rebirth Selection perspective ↗
Open Neuroscience, Synchronicity and the Awakened Brain ↗
Open A Spiritual Awakening ↗
Spiritual & Esoteric Science · continuity of mettā-awareness
If something continues,
does cultivated loving-kindness shape it?
Early Buddhist teaching presents mettā as a repeatedly cultivated “release of heart” and associates it with serenity, an unconfused death and rebirth in a Brahma realm when liberation is not attained. This is a tradition-specific claim about continuity of dispositions and karmic formation, not a claim that an unchanged personal self travels onward.
Equal footing rule Empirical Science and Spiritual & Esoteric Science receive equal investigative attention, respect and scrutiny while retaining distinct methods, provenance and standards of verification. Neither automatically proves or invalidates the other.
Evidence boundary Research can study whether mettā practice produces durable changes in attention, affect, behaviour, relationships and responses near death. It cannot currently determine whether those dispositions continue after irreversible death. The useful hypothesis is therefore conditional: if continuity occurs, are cultivated qualities more persistent than autobiographical identity?
Read AN 11.16 in translation ↗New claim-level input · rights-aware
Channelled records are questions, not confirmations.
The Discovery Register now converts archive themes into bounded research questions about identity-bearing information, NDE timing, source independence, textual convergence and endogenous DMT. Repetition across records does not count as independent evidence.
Current effect on BQ001 More material is now organised for testing, but no claim has crossed the threshold required to change the overall conclusion. BQ001 remains unresolved.
Open the claim evaluation queue →Consciousness Continuity Watch · 15 September 2026
Research activity increased.
The conclusion did not move.
The latest watch report adds a neuroscientific model of psychedelic entity encounters, autonomic correlates of self-transcendence, a small randomised DMT trial, a consciousness-complexity preprint, channelled-text analysis, an active psi-method dispute and an ibogaine cardiac-safety warning.
Current effect on BQ001 These records improve model comparison, safety and methodological scrutiny. None demonstrates survival, reincarnation or independently verified trance communication.
Open the dated watch report →MCI vision · continuity of meaning
A companion for life’s questions—not an answer about death.
AkashicNET’s Meta‑Collective Intelligence vision imagines a human-governed companion for inquiry, meaning and service. It may help people preserve questions, values, sources and contributions across a lifetime. That is continuity of meaning, not evidence of an afterlife or personal survival.
Boundary No digital archive, AI companion or knowledge network can demonstrate that consciousness continues beyond death. BQ001 remains unresolved. The appropriate role of MCI is to support careful inquiry, plural perspectives and compassionate action while the question stays open.
Explore the MCI & Harmonic Singularity vision →Reading companion · 8 October 2026
The Science of Channeling
Helané Wahbeh’s book and interview invite questions about experience, information and its proposed source.
What information would distinguish continuity after death from ordinary information routes and competing explanations? This reading connection does not change BQ001’s UNRESOLVED status.
Read the book companionReading connection · 22 September 2026
An experience of separation.
An open question about continuity.
David Luke’s anomalous-experience review provides a comparison framework for out-of-body experiences, near-death experiences and entity encounters. Similar descriptions across settings invite investigation without establishing survival after death.
Completed study appraisal Small experimental and qualitative comparisons support some DMT–NDE similarities, while the 2025 comparison also identifies content differences. Overlap does not establish equivalence or continuity after death. Read the methods, limitations and follow-up assessment.
Discriminating question What specific perception or identity-bearing information can be checked independently, with timing and ordinary information routes controlled? Experiential resemblance alone cannot answer that question.
Status unchanged BQ001 remains UNRESOLVED. Accepted canonical edges remain 0 and model support remains empty. This editorial connection does not promote claims into evidence.
Read the illustrated guide and source note →What could move the status?
Better tests, not stronger imagery.
Prospective verification
Pre-registered, independently replicated target-identification results under conditions that tightly establish timing and exclude ordinary sensory access.
Continuous physiology
Higher-resolution, time-synchronised brain and body monitoring linked to later reports rather than inference from sparse intervals.
Identity-bearing information
Reliable, specific information unavailable through ordinary means, with independent controls for cueing, leakage, selection and publication bias.
Competing predictions
Models must state in advance what observations would favour, weaken or falsify them—including the continuation model.
Sources & provenance
Follow the record.
These links anchor the current public synthesis. A source may establish an observation without establishing the metaphysical interpretation placed upon it.
- AWARE II — Resuscitation (2023)Prospective multicentre cardiac-arrest study of recalled experience and EEG activity during CPR.Open source ↗
- Dying-brain gamma activity — PNAS (2023)Four-patient observational report of neurophysiological coupling in the dying human brain.Open source ↗
- Cogitate adversarial collaboration — Nature (2025)Preregistered tests of competing neural theories; neither theory received a simple victory.Open source ↗
- Guidelines for studying death and recalled experiences — Annals of the NYAS (2022)A proposed multidisciplinary framework and terminology; not proof of post-mortem survival.Open source ↗
- Division of Perceptual Studies — University of VirginiaInstitutional research programme documenting reports including near-death and past-life-memory cases.Open source ↗
- Haraldsson 2003Small comparative study of children reporting past-life memories; psychological correlates do not establish cause or reincarnation.Open source ↗
- Thomas et al. 2025 (2026 issue)Methodological article proposing stronger child-centred research methods; not evidence for reincarnation.Open source ↗
- Tucker 2025 — cases of the reincarnation typeOverview of more than 2,500 investigated childhood cases and competing explanations; case evidence does not establish a mechanism.Open source ↗
- Moraes et al. 2022 — scoping reviewReview of 78 observational studies: 84% concerned children, 60% were case reports and methodological limitations remain substantial.Open source ↗
- Pasricha et al. 2005 — bodily malformationsTwelve case reports involving unusual skin anomalies or birth defects. The authors describe the correspondence evidence as inconclusive and acknowledge meagre or absent direct evidence in some cases.Open source ↗
- Keil & Tucker 2005 — statements recorded before identificationCase report and comparison of cases with written records made before a proposed previous personality was identified. This reduces one form of retrospective attribution but does not establish reincarnation or eliminate every ordinary pathway.Open source ↗
- AN 11.16 — benefits of mettāEarly Buddhist textual claim that cultivated loving-kindness supports an unconfused death and, absent higher liberation, rebirth in a Brahma realm; traditional testimony, not empirical verification.Open source ↗
- Siderits 2011Oxford philosophy chapter on Buddhist non-self; philosophical analysis, not empirical evidence of post-mortem survival.Open source ↗
- Dahl et al. 2015Peer-reviewed meditation framework concerning cognitive mechanisms of self-processing; not a metaphysical verdict.Open source ↗
- Vago & Silbersweig 2012Theoretical S-ART framework for mindfulness; psychological self-transcendence does not establish brain-independent consciousness.Open source ↗
- SEP: PhysicalismScholarly reference synthesis of physicalist positions; philosophy is not itself proof of non-survival.Open source ↗
- SEP: DualismScholarly reference synthesis of dualist positions; conceptual possibility is not evidence that survival occurs.Open source ↗
- SEP: PanpsychismScholarly reference synthesis of panpsychist positions; panpsychism does not entail personal survival.Open source ↗
- N2N community lead — childhood case documentaryA 2024 Reddit post linking a popular documentary about a claimed childhood past-life case. Review-only secondary media; not a raw case record or independent verification.Open source ↗
- N2N research interview — Jim Tucker (2022)A researcher interview discussing case methods, unusual play, fraud, self-deception and alternative explanations. Interpretive context; not independent confirmation of the cases discussed.Open source ↗
- N2N research interview — Philip Cozzolino (2025)A researcher interview covering childhood past-life reports, fear of death, cultural differences and metaphysical implications. Research commentary; not a reincarnation verdict.Open source ↗
- N2N practice lead — How-To Transcend Death (2025)A community-linked practice or teaching resource about transcending death. Spiritual or contemplative guidance; not empirical evidence of survival.Open source ↗
- N2N continuity commentary — SchwartzReportA community-linked continuity-of-consciousness discussion associated with Stephan A. Schwartz. Commentary and hypothesis context; not a demonstrated survival mechanism.Open source ↗
- N2N artwork — Regeneration of Awareness (2026)An artistic and interpretive exploration of awareness, consciousness, psychedelics and spirituality. Meaning-making imagery; not scientific evidence.Open source ↗
- N2N tradition teaching — What Is Reincarnation?A tradition-specific teaching about reincarnation. Useful for cultural and doctrinal comparison; not an empirical case investigation or universal definition.Open source ↗
- N2N project vision — A Library Without Walls (2026)AkashicNET’s provenance-first living-library vision. It concerns continuity of knowledge and collective stewardship, not personal survival after death.Open source ↗
- N2N historical quotation — imagined former livesA public quotation or reflection imagining life in former centuries. Historical testimony and philosophical reflection; not verified autobiographical memory.Open source ↗
- HIERATIC Book II — Living Wisdom (2026)An editorial roadmap connecting reincarnation, karma and long-term responsibility. Project synthesis; not an evidential source for post-mortem continuity.Open source ↗
- Reincarnation Across Cultures — IONS companion (2026)A historical and conceptual map of rebirth, transmigration and continuity across traditions. Cultural recurrence is not scientific confirmation.Open source ↗
- HOMESENSE613 — Emergence and Networked IntelligenceA working systems-and-phenomenology hypothesis about relational coherence, ecological unity and networked intelligence. It explicitly does not establish planetary consciousness or post-mortem survival.Open source ↗
- AkashicNET — communication across incarnationsA pre-alpha Akashic-field question about communication across incarnations, time and dimensions. Speculative mechanism prompt; no verified communication channel.Open source ↗
- Holberg Debate — Does Consciousness Extend Beyond Brains? (2023)A public debate presenting contrasting expert viewpoints. Debate and disagreement are useful comparison material, not an adjudicated empirical result.Open source ↗
- r/NeuronsToNirvana — Mapping Consciousness DiscourseA community discourse-mapping record. It can show how topics and sources are connected in discussion; discourse topology is not evidence that a metaphysical claim is true.Open source ↗
- Retrocausal Channelled Transmission (2025)A community hypothesis linking a purported retrocausal transmission, fear of death and reincarnation. Testimony and speculative mechanism claim; not a verified information transfer.Open source ↗
- Consciousness 2.0 — Explorer Insights (2024)An exploratory set of consciousness questions and reading prompts, including contemplative-state material. Research agenda input; not a body of confirmed findings.Open source ↗
- N2N Insight Brief — Biological Evidence for Reincarnation (2026)A secondary, partly AI-synthesised lecture brief about childhood cases, birthmarks and congenital anomalies. It records contested reported correlations; it is not primary biological evidence or controlled replication.Open source ↗
- Consciousness Continuity, Rebirth Selection and Future Incarnation Communication (2026)A Spiritual Science perspective and UMASC addendum proposing continuity, selection and future-incarnation communication. Speculative framework; not a verified mechanism or prediction.Open source ↗
- Neuroscience, Synchronicity and the Awakened BrainA community-linked talk connecting spirituality, synchronicity and neuroscience. Interpretive and educational context; neural correlates or psychological benefits do not demonstrate post-mortem continuity.Open source ↗
- A Spiritual Awakening — talk with Lisa MillerA community-linked conversation about spiritual awakening and its psychological or neuroscientific framing. Research and lived-meaning context; not evidence of reincarnation or survival after death.Open source ↗
OPEN QUESTION · EXPLORATION IN PROGRESS · DEEPENING · LEVEL 8/10