Skip to the awareness idea
AkashicOMNI · The Mettā-Dimensional Definition

Philosophical Companion · Interactive Conceptual Map

I Am
Awareness, Meta-Awareness
& Mettā-Awareness

We can notice an experience, recognise our own mental activity, and meet what we notice with goodwill. These are overlapping qualities of how we relate to experience. They are not a ladder of higher consciousness.

Conceptual Map

Notice · Reflect · Care

Overlapping qualities
Awareness, meta-awareness and mettā-awarenessThree overlapping circles represent noticing experience, reflecting on mental activity and responding with goodwill. They are conceptual qualities, not brain regions, physical dimensions or a ladder of higher consciousness.AwarenessNoticingMeta-awarenessReflectingMettā-awarenessGoodwillI am
Awareness with reflection and care

I notice tension, recognise my reaction, and respond with kindness.

These qualities can coexist within one experience.
Previously unnoticed patternsNoticeable thoughts, feelings or reactions
Choose a label to explore its emphasis. The circle boundaries are illustrative. “Mettā-awareness” is a proposed philosophical term.

Three meanings held together

Awareness · Noticing

“I am aware.” I notice a thought, feeling, sensation or perception.

Meta-awareness · Reflecting

“I recognise my mental activity.” For example, I notice that my attention has wandered. [1]

Mettā-awareness · Goodwill

“I meet experience with kindness.” A proposed philosophical term for bringing goodwill to myself and others. Mettā means goodwill, often translated as loving-kindness. [2]

What might “I am” mean?

In everyday language, “I am” expresses being or identity. In contemplation, it can express a recognition of being present. “I am aware that I am” makes the reflective aspect explicit. The phrase alone does not establish a particular theory of consciousness.

For the subconscious, a careful formulation is: “I am becoming aware of previously unnoticed patterns.” What we notice may include an automatic reaction, a recalled memory or a feeling. Noticing these does not give us complete access to their hidden causes.

Connections to theories and research

The connections below are interpretive comparisons. Research on particular processes does not validate this whole philosophical map.

ApproachConnectionBoundary
Metacognition / meta-awarenessRecognising one’s own mental activity is the closest connection to the reflective quality. [1]An account of monitoring experience does not settle how consciousness originates.
Higher-order theoriesThese link conscious states to higher-order representations of mental states. [3]The proposed mechanisms are not simply deliberate introspection or a verbal “I am”.
Global Neuronal WorkspaceConscious access is proposed to involve information becoming broadly available across brain systems. [4]This addresses conscious access; it does not supply the map’s ethical orientation.
Mindfulness / Monitor and Acceptance TheoryDistinguishes attention monitoring from an accepting attitude. Trials found greater positive-affect benefits with monitoring plus acceptance than monitoring alone. [5] [6]Acceptance and explicit goodwill are distinct. Those results do not test “mettā-awareness” as defined here.
Rupert Spira / non-dual interpretationSpira describes awareness as inherently self-aware, while the mind can become reflective. [7]A contemplative and philosophical interpretation, rather than an empirical finding of universal consciousness.

Where this fits within AkashicOMNI

The thirteen analytical perspectives describe the framework’s structure. Metadimensional synthesis considers relationships across those perspectives. The mettā-dimensional orientation brings goodwill to inquiry and action. This companion map explores noticing, reflection and care within lived experience.

These descriptions can coexist. The thirteen perspectives remain analytical lenses; neither those lenses nor the three circles establish extra physical dimensions.

A possible research question, not a result: Does adding explicit goodwill to awareness training improve compassionate behaviour beyond attention monitoring alone? A study would need defined practices, comparison groups and behavioural outcomes. This page is not a study protocol or a new analytical-framework release.

Sources and transparency

  1. Seli and colleagues · Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering · 2017Research distinguishes meta-awareness from intentionality in mind wandering.
  2. Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu · Goodwill · Good Heart, Good MindA Buddhist teaching on mettā as goodwill; a contemplative source.
  3. Brown, Lau and LeDoux · Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness · 2019A theoretical review, not validation of this conceptual map.
  4. Dehaene and Changeux · Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing · 2011The global neuronal workspace account of conscious access.
  5. Lindsay and Creswell · Monitor and Acceptance Theory · 2017A proposed account of mindfulness training mechanisms.
  6. Lindsay and colleagues · How mindfulness training promotes positive emotions · 2018Two randomised trials comparing monitoring with and without acceptance training.
  7. Rupert Spira · The World Is Unlocalised Consciousness · 21 March 2026Spira’s own description of his non-dual position.

Concept direction: the AkashicNET community curator. AI-assisted drafting, source comparison and diagram development. Examples are illustrative, not participant data. “Mettā-awareness” is used here as a proposed term; the source authors do not endorse this map. All Big Questions retain their existing unresolved status.

Boundless Awareness Is Infinite Love. ♾️💗