AkashicOMNI gateway: a dancer with flowing scarf before a luminous toroidal heart, lotus mandala, hypercube and interconnected cosmic field

AkashicOMNI · Living Reference

Everything,
held in view.

One field · 12 perspectives + synthesis · No final certainty
v0.5.0 · PUBLIC REVIEW SPECIFICATION

Cultivating love and wisdom through compassionate inquiry, explicit evidence and conclusions open to revision. Read the improved specification and illustrated introduction →. v0.5.0 is available now for manual, human-reviewed analyses. v0.4.5 remains the previous released reference. Software integration and independent effectiveness validation are ongoing. Method clarified 2 October; availability clarified 7 October 2026. Start with the researcher kit, reusable templates and open research gaps → Try Thinking Space, the first working hackathon draft →

AKASHICOMNI v0.5.0 · 12 PERSPECTIVES + SYNTHESIS

The method.
A tool to practise it.

THE METHOD · AVAILABLEAkashicOMNI v0.5.0Twelve perspectives help examine a question. DISCERN and DEEPEN guide the review; synthesis brings the answer, uncertainty and next steps together.Read the method
THE TOOL · FIRST HACKATHON DRAFTThinking SpaceA working interface under Lifestyle Tools: a plain-English path, everyday and research views, larger text, save/resume files and a draft PRISM transfer.Try Thinking Space
HELP SHAPE THE NEXT DRAFTBring one real question.Flag unclear words, unnecessary steps or access barriers. Test record transfer, suggest a missing research check or compare the method with a simpler review.Explore Plug ’n’ Play contributions

Many Minds. One Next Step.

A visionary companion for the first Thinking Space hackathon draft. TSC2026 · 11–16 October 2026.

Neon streams of thought weave into a luminous heart around a sacred fire, above an earthly landscape and beneath a cosmic sky. Text: AkashicOMNI. Many minds. One next step. 12 perspectives plus synthesis. Thinking Space: first hackathon draft.
Different ways of thinking, a shared space for inquiry.AI-generated conceptual artwork, directed by the project’s human editor. The heart, fire and cosmic connections are artistic metaphors.

See the full framework map · Try Thinking Space · Bring your own contribution

NEW REFERENCE · 1 OCTOBER

AkashicOMNI as a mettā-dimensional concept: awareness, loving-kindness and interconnectedness across lived experience. Read the illustrated definition [1 Min Read · 1 Oct 2026]. A philosophical orientation; the analytical specification remains distinct.

QCI · CONCEPT REFERENCE

Where does collective intelligence sit? Read QCI’s HOMESENSE sources and its relationship to AkashicNET and AkashicOMNI →. Distinguishes Quantum Collective Intelligence from Collective Intelligence Coupling. A source-linked conceptual companion, not an additional numbered perspective or a validated quantum mechanism.

THE LIVING SPECTRUM · INTERACTIVE

Explore five overlapping groups, nineteen intelligence lenses and their crossovers. Open the clickable intelligence wheel →

NEW CLAIM REVIEW · 26 SEPTEMBER

Peter Jones argues for nondual idealism by eliminating rival positions. Read the illustrated AkashicOMNI claim audit → with its inference boundary and transparent editorial attribution. This review does not announce a v0.5.0 framework release.

NEW CONCEPT REVIEW · 26 SEPTEMBER

Could an AI help us converse with Daniel Dennett’s ideas without impersonating him? Explore the illustrated Dennett dialogue concept and full transparency report →.

CONFERENCE DISCUSSION · 30 SEPTEMBER

Is consciousness multiscale? Explore microtubules, cellular energetics and neural networks, with a printable A4 handout, full PDF report and source access ledger. Exploratory candidate; mechanism and ontology remain unresolved.

NEW PAPER REVIEW · 27 SEPTEMBER

Michael Levin’s “Ingressing Minds” asks whether physical systems interface with agential patterns. Explore the argument map, evidence boundaries and twelve-claim transparency chart →.

PHILOSOPHICAL COMPANION · EXPANDED 3 NOVEMBER

I Am · Awareness, Meta-Awareness & Mettā-Awareness. Awareness: Notice, Reflect, Care. Explore overlapping qualities, six descriptive questions, a widescreen visual and practical connections across the frameworks. Read the expanded companion [Approx. 8 Min Read · 3 Nov 2026].

INTERACTIVE CONCEPT REVIEW · 27 SEPTEMBER

Is consciousness unreal, or is our map incomplete? Explore Tim Bayne’s question through twelve perspectives and synthesis →, with evidence boundaries and a source ledger.

OMNI means many viewpoints, not omniscience

A wider field.
A humbler conclusion.

AkashicOMNI is the main gateway into AkashicNET’s twelve analytical perspectives and an integrating synthesis. It brings science, history, lived experience, philosophy, ecology, creativity and contemplative traditions into one reviewable process.

Its purpose is not to make every worldview equivalent. It is to reveal agreements, tensions, missing evidence and consequences before a conclusion is strengthened.

Current boundary: AkashicOMNI is a human-governed analytical framework, not a native AI engine. Explore the platform landscape and possible evolution →

AkashicNET v0.17.0 · Evidence Intelligence Beta · PUBLISHED PRE-RELEASE →
PUBLIC READING · TSC2026

Read the revised, condensed HIERATIC: Foundations of Wisdom and Across Space & Time, the PSI Atlas supplement on trance channeling and psychic inquiry. Open the public reading shelf →

REALITY CHECK

“13D” means twelve analytical perspectives plus one synthesis. The hypercube, orb, torus and Indra’s Net are navigational and contemplative metaphors. They do not establish thirteen physical dimensions, a universal consciousness field or paranormal causation.

NEW INTERACTIVE VISUAL · 26 SEPTEMBER

Explore twelve perspectives and synthesis as thought bubbles in two reciprocal geometries: a sphere within a pyramid and a pyramid within a sphere. Open Music of the Spheres →

STUDY PROTOCOL SAMPLE · 26 SEPTEMBER

How could a claim that consciousness is fundamental become a testable prediction? Explore two separate research tracks, an audited future-target task and the limits of what any outcome could establish. Read the illustrated study protocol →

v0.5.0 · METHOD AVAILABLE · TOOL IN DRAFT

The Public Review Specification supports human-reviewed inquiry. Thinking Space provides a first working interface, with file-preservation and draft mapping checks. Wider integration and independent evaluation remain in development. Read the current status and development priorities →

AkashicOMNI In View

Historical v0.4.3 illustrations. The current clarification below distinguishes the two EXPAND² passes from their synthesis output; Notice · Discern · Serve remains a separate reflective guide. Open either image for a closer look. The text below the visuals provides the framework and source details.

AkashicOMNI v0.4.3 overview: thirteen analytical perspectives and eight biographical cases, distinguishing recollection, biography, testimony, unresolved citations and abstract-only evidence.
Historical v0.4.3 artwork · Eight LivesCurrent description: 12 perspectives + synthesis. DISCERN and DEEPEN are the two review passes; SYNTHESISE is their output.
Two people share a reflective moment in a cosmic garden. Notice: What am I experiencing? Discern: What supports my interpretation? Serve: What response could help?
Notice · Discern · ServeA reflective connection with HIERATIC015C1: notice bodily cues, check evidence and alternatives, act with care and reconsider.

AI-generated artistic metaphors. Available image resolution: 1672 × 941 pixels. Embodied intelligence informing wisdom is a reflective principle, not a validated formula.

AkashicOMNI v0.5.0 In Full

12 perspectives help you examine a question. Synthesis brings the answer together. The map also shows the two review passes, optional modules, supporting tools and ways readers can contribute. Open it full size to read the component references.

Complete AkashicOMNI v0.5.0 map: AWAKEN, HIERATIC, HOMESENSE, ADAPT, REGENERATE, TRANSCEND, METAD, ACTC, CUT Past, CUT Present, CUT Future and UMASC, followed by synthesis. Includes EXPAND², optional DARK and ACTC modules, external QMM, Thinking Space, PRISM and reader contribution possibilities.
The method, its constituents and the first working tool draft.Recorded source and addendum references are preserved. The text specification supplies the full definitions, scope and review limits.

Download the scalable map (.svg) · Read the component register

12 perspectives + synthesis

Twelve lenses.
One accountable synthesis.

01

AWAKEN

Begin with wonder, then examine the claim.

02

HIERATIC

Read symbols through history, culture and context.

03

HOMESENSE · PHASE 8

Bring inquiry back to embodied human experience.

04

ADAPT

Ask what helps life respond intelligently to change.

05

REGENERATE

Look beyond survival toward renewed bodies, minds and ecosystems.

06

TRANSCEND

Explore beyond habitual frames without abandoning discernment.

07

#METAD · v2.1

Observe thought, meaning and awareness across levels.

08

ACTC · v2.0

Agency, context, temporal order and candidate causes.

09

MultidimensionalCUT · source v4.0.3 · PAST

Trace ancestry, causes and inherited narratives.

10

MultidimensionalCUT · source v4.0.3 · PRESENT

Examine what is observable and actionable now.

11

MultidimensionalCUT · source v4.0.3 · FUTURE

Explore possible, probable and preferable pathways.

12

UMASC · v7.2

Hold multiple scales of mind, society and cosmos together.

OUTPUT

AkashicNET SYNTHESIS

Connect provenance, uncertainty, perspectives and consequences.

Embodied intelligence · comparative case pathway

Constraint changed the conditions.
Imagination kept building.

This pathway asks how illness, disability, neurodiversity, solitude and sensory difference intersect with creative work. It does not treat suffering as a prerequisite, diagnosis as destiny or biography as proof of a causal mechanism.

01

Charles Babbage

Biographical context / source account
Babbage recalled serious childhood fevers and being sent to a school at Alphington, near Exeter, with instructions to prioritise his health.
Interpretive description of work
Mechanical computation · systems architecture · internal modelling
Contribution
Designed the programmable Analytical Engine, which was not completed in his lifetime.

Recollection reproduced by a local-history source; originating edition not inspected.

Context source · Exeter Memories ↗Contribution source · Science Museum ↗
02

Srinivasa Ramanujan

Biographical context / source account
MacTutor describes episodes of illness and financial hardship; Ramanujan died aged 32.
Interpretive description of work
Mathematical intuition · pattern recognition · symbolic compression
Contribution
Produced original identities and conjectures that continue to shape mathematics.

Secondary scholarly biography; no retrospective diagnosis inferred.

Context source · MacTutor · University of St Andrews ↗Contribution source · MacTutor · University of St Andrews ↗
03

Nikola Tesla

Biographical context / source account
In his autobiography, Tesla reported severe illness, intense sensory experiences and vivid mental imagery.
Interpretive description of work
Visual-spatial simulation · electrical systems · invention
Contribution
Described testing complex machines in imagination before physical construction.

Autobiographical testimony in an online transcription; sensory claims are not independently verified.

Context source · Tesla's autobiographical testimony ↗Contribution source · Tesla's autobiographical testimony ↗
04

Johannes Kepler

Biographical context / source account
The cited biography describes Kepler's life and astronomical work; the specific childhood-health account requires a separate source.
Interpretive description of work
Geometric reasoning · astronomical synthesis · model revision
Contribution
Reframed planetary motion through mathematically testable laws.

Citation gap: the linked MacTutor biography does not substantiate childhood smallpox or lasting physical limitations.

Context source · MacTutor · University of St Andrews ↗Contribution source · MacTutor · University of St Andrews ↗
05

Blaise Pascal

Biographical context / source account
MacTutor describes recurrent poor health from youth and substantial pain during adult life.
Interpretive description of work
Mathematics · probability · mechanical calculation · philosophy
Contribution
Moved between abstract reasoning, practical machines and questions of meaning.

Secondary scholarly biography; illness is not an explanation of achievement.

Context source · MacTutor · University of St Andrews ↗Contribution source · MacTutor · University of St Andrews ↗
06

Michael Faraday

Biographical context / source account
Historical scholarship discusses Faraday's reported memory difficulties; the underlying records require further inspection.
Interpretive description of work
Experimental insight · field thinking · physical visualisation
Contribution
Made invisible electromagnetic relationships experimentally legible.

Health source: research abstract only. Full paper, letters and physician notes not inspected; no diagnostic conclusion adopted.

Context source · Larner · research abstract ↗Contribution source · Royal Institution ↗
07

Charles Darwin

Biographical context / source account
In a letter of March 1849, Darwin described recurrent symptoms that limited travel and work.
Interpretive description of work
Long-horizon observation · biological synthesis · explanatory modelling
Contribution
Published On the Origin of Species in 1859, developing his account of evolution by natural selection.

First-person correspondence; this letter alone does not establish a decades-long illness history.

Context source · Darwin to Hooker · 28 March 1849 ↗Contribution source · Darwin Online · publication history ↗
08

Stephen Hawking

Biographical context / source account
The estate biography describes Hawking's motor neurone disease diagnosis during early adulthood.
Interpretive description of work
Mathematical cosmology · spatial abstraction · communication
Contribution
Advanced the study of black holes, cosmology and the relationship between gravity and quantum theory.

Estate biography; not an independent clinical record.

Context source · Stephen Hawking Estate ↗Contribution source · Stephen Hawking Estate ↗
AKASHICOMNI INFERENCE BOUNDARY

These are comparisons, not a clinical dataset. The descriptions of intelligence are editorial interpretations, not measured traits. These selected achievers are not a representative sample and provide no comparison group or measure of wisdom. Source access was checked on 19 September 2026; this was an AI-assisted editorial audit, not independent human review. They support questions about adaptation, access, attention and forms of intelligence. They do not establish that illness creates genius, that suffering is beneficial, or that exceptional achievement compensates for unmet care needs.

Embodied Intelligence, Wisdom And Discernment

Embodied intelligence informs wisdom; love and discernment guide it into service.

Within this framework, bodily awareness can contribute to wise judgement when considered alongside reflection, evidence, ethics and consequences. Bodily intuition can be mistaken. This is an interpretive principle, not a validated formula, a clinical assessment or a claim that illness produces wisdom.

Applying The Existing Method

  1. Identify the claim. State the precise question and distinguish observation, testimony, interpretation, hypothesis and speculation.
  2. Name the source and access. Give the source and location, say what was actually inspected, and distinguish first-person testimony, secondary biography and independent corroboration. A link alone does not establish verification or reuse rights.
  3. Examine the inference. Separate biographical context, interpretive descriptions of work and contribution. Compare alternative explanations; do not infer diagnosis or causation from resemblance or achievement.
  4. Preserve uncertainty. Record missing information and relevant contrary evidence. An outcome signal expresses an assessment, not a truth score or permission to promote evidence.
  5. Connect insight with action. Explain what a proportionate, compassionate action could be and what observations would change the assessment. Keep the framework version and assessment date with the result.

The connection with HIERATIC015C1, Walking With Wisdom, is reflective: understanding finds expression in compassionate service. This is an interpretation, not an additional scientific finding. Artwork illustrates the framework; generated portraits and symbols are not documentary evidence.

COMPONENT REFERENCE CLARIFICATION · 2 OCTOBER

CUT’s original source is headed v4.0.3; the candidate records a v4.0.4 addendum. ACTC, METAD and UMASC likewise have source-plus-addendum references. Read the component register and its access limits. The labels above identify original sources, not freshly verified latest versions.

EXPAND² · v0.1

Two review passes.
One synthesis output.

  1. 1 · DISCERNIdentify the question, sources, evidence type, assumptions, uncertainty and possible harm.
  2. 2 · DEEPENRevisit through contrasting lenses, seek disconfirming evidence, compare alternatives and clarify what changed.

OUTPUT · SYNTHESISE
Report the synthesis, uncertainty, limits and next questions. The outcome may remain unresolved or warrant caution; a second pass does not guarantee stronger evidence.

Optional Inquiry Prompts may be skipped, combined, reordered or revisited. They guide the process; the perspectives guide where attention is directed.

NOTICE · QUESTION · INTEGRATE · SYNTHESISE · CHOOSE · ACT · REFLECT · SHARE · CULTIVATE.

Applying EXPAND² across HOMESENSE posts explains how source-linked synthesis can inform the existing perspectives while preserving differences and uncertainty. The wider-series review remains proposed.

Interpretive outcome labels

Name the outcome.
State the evidence separately.

Outcome labels describe an interpretive assessment, not an evidence rating, confidence score or permission to promote a claim. Source-specific evidence status and uncertainty must be stated separately.

RESONANCE

A meaningful connection worth following.

EPIPHANY

A strong integrative insight, still open to checking.

REVELATION

A powerful lived or interpretive conclusion—not automatic proof.

UNRESOLVED

Evidence does not yet justify yes or no.

CAUTION

A claim risks harm, overreach or evidential confusion.

ARCHITECTURE PROPOSAL · REVIEW REQUIRED

Earlier labels need a traceable review.

CURRENT NUMBERED LENSESD09–D11 · Past, Present and FutureThe twelve-perspective structure above retains its past, present and future lenses, followed by synthesis. This proposal does not change them or claim additional physical time dimensions.
PROPOSED LABEL · NOT CANONICALGUI · ConsciousnessA possible contributing capability for review. Relationships to AWAKEN, HOMESENSE and UMASC have not been established by an inspectable source or approved review record.
PROPOSED LABEL · NOT CANONICALCUT · Cross-scaleA possible comparison capability for review. Relationships to MultidimensionalCUT and AkashicNET synthesis remain unapproved.

Public change record

Version history.
Every change remains visible.

CURRENT MANUAL METHOD · PUBLIC REVIEW

AkashicOMNI v0.5.0

Published 1 October · Method clarified 2 October · Availability clarified 7 October 2026

Adds structured claim records, explicit perspective coverage, source-access notes and revision conditions. Available for manual, human-reviewed use. The 7 October update adds a researcher starter kit and open questions, plus the Thinking Space hackathon draft. The current description is 12 perspectives + synthesis; the interface and method are identified separately. This clarification keeps the method at v0.5.0. Integration and independent evaluation remain ongoing. Earlier assessments retain their original method and date.

PREVIOUS RELEASED REFERENCE

AkashicOMNI v0.4.5

27 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Clarifies EXPAND² as two review passes, DISCERN and DEEPEN, followed by a synthesis output; aligns the ACTC lens with its existing repository description of agency, context, temporal order and candidate causes; and distinguishes interpretive outcome labels from evidence ratings. Prompted by the 27 September cross-surface consistency audit, not an external framework or post series. This documentation patch adds no lens or capability and changes no evidence status or prior assessment. Earlier assessments retain their original version and date and are not recalculated. At this release, the proposed v0.5.0 claim-review capability was unreleased; the later Public Review Specification is recorded separately.

EARLIER RELEASE

AkashicOMNI v0.4.4

27 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Clarifies the provenance of the v0.2.0 governance release following PR #315: governance was introduced to distinguish ordinary publications from method changes; no external framework or major post series prompted that release. This dated documentation patch changes no analytical method, evidence boundary or earlier result. Earlier assessments remain unaffected, unrecalculated and retain their original version and date. At this release, the proposed v0.5.0 claim-review capability was unreleased.

EARLIER RELEASE

AkashicOMNI v0.4.3

19 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Corrects source attribution and citation gaps in the eight embodied-intelligence cases, distinguishes interpretation from measured traits, and adds direct context and contribution sources. Kepler’s health claim remains unresolved and Faraday’s health source is marked abstract-only. The thirteen perspectives are unchanged; earlier assessments are not recalculated. At this release, the proposed v0.5.0 claim-review capability was unreleased.

EARLIER RELEASE

AkashicOMNI v0.4.2

19 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Clarifies how embodied intelligence may contribute to wisdom and improves guidance on claims, source access, inference, uncertainty and compassionate action. The thirteen perspectives and eight comparative cases are retained. Earlier assessments are not automatically recalculated. These were refinements of the existing method; v0.5.0 had not yet been published.

EARLIER RELEASE

AkashicOMNI v0.4.0

16 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Added the Embodied Intelligence comparative case pathway, beginning with Babbage’s documented Exeter connection. The capability separates biographical context, expressed intelligence and contribution while explicitly blocking causal inference, diagnostic speculation and the romanticisation of suffering. The thirteen analytical perspectives remain unchanged.

EARLIER RELEASE · PUBLICATION ADDENDUM

AkashicOMNI v0.3.0

14 September 2026 · ADDENDUM 18 SEPTEMBER 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Established AkashicOMNI as a Living Reference and added this stable, directly shareable specification link. A later Beyond the Jar publication addendum applies the framework to personal testimony, product provenance, Indigenous context, CARE, evidence categories and harm reduction without changing the thirteen analytical perspectives. Earlier assessments were not automatically recalculated.

GOVERNANCE RELEASE

AkashicOMNI v0.2.0

14 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Minor upgrade adding compatible public version governance and the Publication Impact Classifier. Prompted by the need, identified after the v0.1.0 foundation release, to distinguish ordinary publications from changes to the AkashicOMNI method; no external framework or major post series triggered this release. The analytical method, evidence boundaries and interpretations of earlier results are unchanged. Earlier assessments remain unaffected, were not recalculated, and retain their original framework version and assessment date.

FOUNDATION RELEASE

AkashicOMNI v0.1.0

14 September 2026 · PRE-ALPHA

Introduced the metadimensional gateway, thirteen analytical perspectives, EXPAND² process and evidence-aware outcome signals.

PATCH · +0.0.1

A correction, clarification or material improvement to an existing rule.

MINOR · +0.1.0

A compatible new lens, process or reusable analytical capability.

MAJOR · +1.0.0

A structural change to the core method, evidence boundaries or meaning of earlier results.

Footnote for new manual analysesMethod: AkashicOMNI v0.5.0 Public Review Specification, clarification 2 October 2026 (https://akashicnet.org/akashicomni/v0-5-0). State the analysis date, scope, sources and access limits. Manual application does not imply full software validation. Earlier analyses retain their original version and date.

Boundless inquiry · compassionate purpose

OMNI sees the many.
ONE remembers the whole.

Compassion guides purpose. Evidence governs factual claims. Wisdom serves all beings.

Explore Big Questions →Explore possible futures →
Source access and correction history · 28 September 2026 · Rechecked 22 October 2026

These are dated retrieval observations. An unavailable source is not evidence that its claims are false.

Download the 22 October access observations

Download original URLs, retrieval results and citation context